Interview
with David Bailey (atmaweapon42), Professor of Writing and Linguistics at
Altamaha Technical College, 10/01/12, again in regards to my dissertation.
-How would you define a YouTube Poop
from a regular remix?
-Would you describe the movement as
anti-commercial?
-YouTube's been an important
platform for this due to the accessibility it lends and social interaction.
Where do you see the YTP progressing to? And is it dependant on this form of
interaction?
I think YTP differs from
regular remix with its almost obsessive need to communicate cultural memes and
transmit a new language. What YTP does, is take what some would consider crap
and re-package it in a way that is artistically relevant and original. Most of
the YTP practitioners take unction at any attempt to classify there work as any
art though, and defend it as a simple past time that is worthless by
definition.
What you have is a classic
counter-culture, and YES it definitely resists commercialism whilst
simultaneously offering a new type of media filter, pointing viewers to new,
odd, and interesting material. One of the most important jumps YTP is going to
make (and I do believe it is already here with some users) is to move away from
pure copyright content and focus more on original material produced on YouTube
and other open platforms.
Take Renard Queenston for
example. Renard is a legit remix artist who sells CDs. He produces traditional
music albums. I would NEVER have discovered Renard had it not been for the
Constant YTP remixes of his songs spliced with other media. YTP served as a
content aggregate making extremely popular videos from what could have been an
obscure source. I have spoken with Renard and he actually has seen the bump in
his popularity generated by these sales.
No comments:
Post a Comment